PIEDMONT COLLEGE
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
Mastering the art of teaching: Preparing
proactive educators to improve the lives of all children

I. COURSE
INFORMATION:
Prerequisites: EDUC 355, SPED 311 Credit: 3 semester hours
II. INSTRUCTOR
INFORMATION:
Name: Dr.
Donna Andrews
Office Location: L
108
Phone Numbers: 706
778-8500 ext. 1256 Home: 706
878-3835 (please call before 9:30 p.m.)
E-mail: dandrews@piedmont.edu
Fax Number:706 776-0135
Office Hours: Mon. 1-3
p.m. Wed. 10-12 a.m. or by appointment
III. TIME
AND PLACE
CAMPUS: Demorest SEMESTER: Spring
Time: 5:50 – 10:10 p.m.
Place:
Stewart 117
IV. TEXT
AND SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS:
Westling, D. & Fox, L. (2004). Teaching students with severe disabilities, (3rd ed.) Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Publishers.
American
Psychological Association. (2001). Publication
manual of the American Psychological
Association (5th ed.).
Washington, D. C.: Author.
Supplemental readings will be required
as needed throughout the course. These readings will include research, professional
documents, and personal reading. Also,
copying some materials to share with the class may be required.
V. PIEDMONT
MISSION:
Piedmont
College Mission:
Inspired by the liberal arts tradition and a historical association with the Congregational Christian Churches, Piedmont College cultivates a diverse, challenging and caring intellectual environment to encourage academic success and spiritual development.
To accomplish this mission, the college offers a number of major fields of study that are informed by the liberal arts, including specialized professional programs and selected graduate programs. Instructional opportunities are also provided at distant locations to meet student needs.
School of
Education Mission:
The theme of the School of Education is “Mastering the art of teaching: Preparing proactive educators to improve the lives of children.” The School of Education strives to prepare reflective, scholarly, proactive educators in a caring environment with challenging and meaningful learning experiences. These practitioners effectively educate their own students to become knowledgeable, inquisitive, and collaborative learners in diverse, democratic learning communities.
Specific ideals under-gird our conceptual
framework. We advocate the democratic
ideals of: equal rights and opportunities; individual freedom and responsibility;
responsibility for the greater good; respect for diversity; openness to
possibilities; and open, informed discourse.
We endorse the following processes as a means of
striving for our democratic ideals: engaging in participatory decision-making;
collaborating in teaching and learning; collecting information from all
constituencies; examining options and projecting
consequences; nurturing open discourse; providing for field experiences;
assessing processes as well as products; modeling democratic ideals in the
classroom; forming communities of learners; and constantly revising the curriculum to reflect new insights and
understandings. Further, we endorse the
development of a sense of personal integrity and of strong habits of mind
(e.g., reflectiveness, persistence,
clarity, accuracy, and responsiveness to feedback).
This
is a foundational course for special educators. The goal of the special
education program at Piedmont College is to provide undergraduate candidates
knowledge in the behavioral, educational, and social development of
students. Through an individualized
program of the study the program seeks to:
¨
Explain, discuss, and
provide opportunities for application of the philosophical, historical, and
legal foundations of special education, specific to mental
retardation/developmental disabilities.
¨
Provide the candidate
with the ability to understand, discuss, and apply the learning and behavioral
characteristics of students with mental retardation/ developmental
disabilities.
¨
Provide the candidate
with opportunities to learn and apply an understanding of assessment,
diagnosis, and academic and behavioral evaluation of students with mental
retardation/developmental disabilities.
¨
Inform the candidates of
instructional content and practice for educating students with mental
retardation/developmental disabilities, and provide opportunities to refine
their understandings.
¨
Provide opportunities to
demonstrate skills specific to applied behavior analysis when teaching students
with mental retardation/developmental disabilities to manage their own
behaviors.
¨
Provide opportunities to
candidates to demonstrate and apply professionalism and ethical practices when
teaching students with mental retardation/developmental disabilities.
VI. COURSE
DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE:
This course examines the philosophical foundations, methods, materials, teaching and instructional strategies for working with individuals with severe and profound intellectual disabilities in the home, school, and community settings. This course will examine issues and teaching methodology relative to the life span of individuals with severe and profound intellectual disabilities, ranging from parenting issues, inclusion, community-based instruction, transitioning to post-school environments, supported employment, to retirement, and estate planning.
The purpose of this course is to train
teachers to work with the continuum of learners that they will be certified to
teach in the public school setting.
Additionally, this course will prepare candidates to teach individuals
with severe and profound intellectual disabilities in the least restrictive
environment, so these students can become less dependent on others, and
participate as fully as possible in their communities and work environments when
they graduate from public school.
VII. SCHOOL
OF EDUCATION OUTCOMES
Core
Candidate Learning Outcomes :
The following outcomes, adapted from the 1994 INTASC standards (Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium) and updated Fall 2003, are addressed in this course.
1)
Learning Environment: The proactive teacher uses an
understanding of individual and group motivation to create a caring, democratic
learning environment that encourages positive social interaction, active
engagement in learning, self regulation, and collaboration. The proactive
teacher fosters the ideals of a democratic
classroom by treating students fairly and justly, providing intellectual
challenge, and supporting students as they pursue knowledge and
understanding.
2)
Subject
Matter: The scholarly teacher understands and can model the central
concepts, tools of inquiry, national standards, and structures of the
discipline(s) he or she teaches and can create learning experiences that make
these aspects of subject matter meaningful for students.
3) Student Learning: The reflective teacher understands how students
develop and learn and provides well-managed learning opportunities that support
students’ intellectual, social, and personal growth. The teacher documents
student achievements and contributes to systems of accountability designed to
improve schooling.
4) Diversity:
By understanding that all learners are products of their innate abilities,
preferred learning styles, and cultural experiences, the democratic teacher
modifies instruction and assessments to meet diverse needs of all students.
5) Instructional Strategies: The proactive teacher understands and
uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage the development of all
students’ creative talents, critical thinking, problem solving, and performance
skills.
6) Assessment Strategies: The scholarly, reflective, proactive teacher
designs a variety of assessments including alternative assessment strategies,
which (a) assess the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and dispositions
expected in the subject, (b) offset the negative effects of high-stakes
testing, and (c) encourage the continual intellectual, social, and personal
growth of all students to become knowledgeable, inquisitive learners.
7) Communication and Technology: The proactive teacher uses knowledge of
effective verbal, non-verbal, and media communication techniques and
technologies to foster active inquiry, collaboration,
and supportive interaction in the classroom.
8) Planning Instruction: The scholarly, reflective, proactive teacher
plans and manages instruction based upon knowledge of content, pedagogy,
students, the community, and curriculum goals.
9) Reflection and Professional Development: The scholarly teacher is a reflective
practitioner who continually evaluates the effects of her/his choices and
actions upon others, institutes research aimed at improving instruction,
attends to the development of policies affecting education at the state and
national levels, proactively seeks opportunities for the continual development
of a personal pedagogy.
10) Collaboration and Relationships: The scholarly, reflective, proactive teacher
communicates and collaborates with other educators, parents/families,
agencies and the community through democratic processes to support
student learning and well being.:
Dispositions for All Candidates:
In addition to the common core learning outcomes, all
candidates are expected to be familiar with the dispositions expected of
professionals. Their work with students,
families, and communities reflects the following dispositions as defined by the
School of Education faculty:
Scholarly: Inquiring; creative; seeks solutions; thinks
critically about theory and method; keeps current in discipline (conferences,
journals, classes); pursues lifelong learning.
Reflective: Bases daily decisions on in depth
reflection, done frequently and honestly; considers many possibilities for
problem solutions; stays open to constructive criticism.
Proactive: Anticipates problems in management;
anticipates problems and difficulties in instruction; addresses pertinent
issues of school and community to support student learning; encourages
students’ critical thinking, problem solving, and creativity; plans for
important student learning; fosters visionary thinking and action; promotes
mindful leadership to improve schools.
Democratic: Facilitator; views others as capable to deal
with problems and able to make decisions; promotes equitable treatment for all
students; has high expectations for all students; seeks best interest of
students they serve; open-minded; able to view other perspectives; accommodates
individual differences; culturally sensitive in areas of communications,
learning, assessment, and cultural norms; collaborates well with others; works
for the good of the community.
Responsible: Patience, professional temperament; aims to
be the best he/she can be; good work ethic; punctual; recognizes when their own
dispositions may need to be adjusted and are able to develop plans to do
so.
VIII. COURSE
OUTCOMES (CO):
Upon successful completion of this course, the candidate will be able to:
1.
Explain, discuss, and
provide opportunities for application of the philosophical, historical, and
legal foundations of special education, specific to mental
retardation/developmental disabilities.
2.
Provide the candidate
with the ability to understand, discuss, and apply the learning and behavioral
characteristics of students with mental retardation/ developmental
disabilities.
3.
Provide the candidate
with opportunities to learn and apply an understanding of assessment,
diagnosis, and academic and behavioral evaluation of students with mental
retardation/developmental disabilities.
4.
Inform the candidates of
instructional content and practice for educating students with mental
retardation/developmental disabilities, and provide opportunities to refine
their understandings.
5.
Provide opportunities to
demonstrate skills specific to applied behavior analysis when teaching students
with mental retardation/developmental disabilities to manage their own
behaviors.
6.
Provide opportunities to
candidates to demonstrate and apply professionalism and ethical practices when
teaching students with mental retardation/developmental disabilities.
Discuss and provide application opportunities for the:
1. Learning characteristics of individuals
with severe disabilities.
2. The philosophy of community based
instruction and teaching functional academics.
3.
The implementation of
community based vocational instruction.
4.
The steps required to
conduct an ecological inventory.
5.
Instructional planning
and implementation of the ecological inventory.
6.
Systems for data
collection for skills taught in the classroom, home, and community.
7.
Health care procedures
and physical management.
8.
Assistive technology and
alternative communication/technology.
9.
Employment, transition,
and person centered planning.
10. IEPs, ISPs, IWRPs, as related to transition planning.
11. Reinforcement systems and schedules to be used in a
variety of environments.
12. Employment:
Sheltered, Supported, and Competitive and Fair Labor Standards.
This class will operate as a democratic classroom. Candidates will engage in shared decision-making and in taking responsibility for making the classroom the best it can be. Interactive discussion and problem solving will be emphasized. All ideas and contributions will be explored and respected.
IX. COURSE
POLICIES & PROCEDURES:
1.
Class Attendance/Participation:
Attendance, timeliness, and participation are required
and part of your grade. The School of
Education policy states that more than the allotted number of excused absences
for any reason will result in failure of the course. The allotted number of excused absences is as follows:
·
Day classes meeting
three times a week for entire semester: 6 absences
·
Day classes meeting two
times a week for entire semester: 4 absences
·
All eight-week classes:
1 absence
·
Evening classes meeting
for entire semester: 3 absences
Only those absences due to emergencies will be
excused. Work missed due to an excused
absence may be made up. It is the
student’s responsibility to inform the professor in writing how he or she plans
to make up the work. Any student who
misses more than the allowable number of classes will be asked to drop the
course or will receive an F at the end of the semester. Please contact the professor prior to an
absence when possible.
Active participation means that every student prepares for class by reading the text and/or other assigned readings and that each student actively participates in discussions and activities conducted during class.
INCOMPLETES – A candidate may receive an incomplete (I) for
reasons such as illness or other extenuating circumstances upon approval of
the course instructor and the dean.
An incomplete is not granted just to extend time to complete work that
should have been done in a timely manner.
(See the Piedmont College catalog for additional information regarding
an incomplete).
If
the candidate’s illness is extended, causing more than two class absences, the
candidate may need to request in writing a medical withdrawal. If the Registrar approves the request, a
candidate may receive a “W” for the course.
INCLEMENT
WEATHER – In general, classes are
dismissed or cancelled (day and/or night classes) when conditions in and around
Demorest become such that the main streets and college parking lots become too
dangerous on which to drive. Candidates
who live outside the Demorest area for which road conditions are too difficult
to proceed should stay at home.
Candidates who miss class should consult their instructors for
assignments and make-up work. Dismissed
or cancelled classes must be made up during semester breaks, the first
available Saturday, or an agreed upon make-up by class members and the
professor. When classes are dismissed,
the following radio/TV stations will be informed of the action taken: Station
WCON (99.3 FM) – Cornelia; WMJE (102.9 FM) – Clarkesville/Gainesville; WNEG
(6.30 AM) – Toccoa; WAGA TV – Fox 5, Atlanta; WNEG TV Ch. 32; and WXIA TV – 11
Alive.
PARTICIPATION - Active participation means:
Ø
prepare for classes by
reading the text and/or other assigned readings;
Ø
attend all classes for
duration of allotted class time;
Ø
take active part and
contribute significantly during class discussions and activities;
Ø
be attentive and
respectful of peers and the professor during the discussions, dialogue, and
presentations;
Ø
submit all assignments
on time.
2.
Written Work:
Use
APA style (5th ed.). All
papers for the course are to be typed using size 12 print and one of the
following fonts: Bookman, Times New Roman, Geneva, or similar font. Papers should be double-spaced, error-free,
and grammatically correct (including punctuation, spelling, capitalization,
etc.). Make good use of writing
references such as dictionaries, writing handbooks, and computer spelling and
grammar checks.
Quality is important! Work
submitted should reflect your professionalism and graduate level work. Your writings and reflections will be assessed
according to the depth, breadth, clarity, and accuracy they convey.
Be sure to keep a duplicate copy of all submitted work for your
own records.
3.
Academic Integrity:
By
accepting admission to Piedmont College, each candidate makes a commitment to
understand, support, and abide by the "Academic Integrity Policy"
without compromise or exception. This
class will be conducted in strict observance of the policy. Refer to your Piedmont College Student
Handbook for details.
All
work submitted must be your original work created in and for this course. It should be referenced properly using APA
(including information from the internet).
Double dipping (to be discussed in class) is not permitted.
4.
Special Considerations: Piedmont College makes every effort to provide
candidates with learning disabilities equal access to all academic
programs. Reasonable and appropriate
accommodations are coordinated through the Academic Support Office. Candidates are obligated to self-disclose
and are responsible for providing accurate and current (not older than three
years) documentation of their learning disability to the Director of Academic
Support before receiving accommodations.
Candidates with any special needs
(disabilities, problems, or any other factors that may affect their performance
or that require special instructional strategies) should make these special
needs known to the professor/instructor during the first class session.
X. STUDENT EXPECTATIONS AND COURSE
OUTLINE:
1. Instructional Methods
This class will operate as a democratic classroom. Candidates will engage in shared decision-
making and in taking responsibility for making the classroom the best it can
be. Interactive discussions and problem
solving will be emphasized where all ideas and contributions are explored and
respected. Various approaches will be
utilized by the candidates and professor including: lecture, demonstrations, observations, class discussions, small
group discussions, cooperative group work, field observations, use of
educational technology, student presentations, readings, writings, listening,
questioning, and formative and summative evaluations.
2.
Assignments:
Readings from the assigned texts will be the focus for discussions, writings, and group activities. Please read the assigned readings before coming to class in order to facilitate quality discussions. Think about how the readings relate or could relate to your classroom teaching experiences. Also keep in mind that you are responsible for the reading assignments even if we do not go over them in class.
a.
Description of Assessments & Assignments and their
due dates
1.
EXAMS: Two
exams will be administered during the course of this class. Each exam will be a combination of multiple
choice, fill in the blank, short and long discussion questions. Each exam will
count 20% of your grade.
2.
Guest Speakers:
There will be several guest speakers from different agencies that work
with individuals with severe/profound disabilities. No one will be excused from these sessions.
3.
FIELD EXPERIENCE CASE STUDY: A case study will be turned in on the last night of class. You may use students in public school or
adults in a service center as your participants. We will discuss confidentiality and other prerequisites for
working with individuals with severe/profound intellectual disabilities as the
course progresses.
The case
study should include the following sections (with each section clearly marked
in bold letters underlined):
a.
Historical data:
age, educational background, vocational and community background if
appropriate.
b.
Skills the individual has: communication, mobility, physical,
vocational, social, cognitive, recreational, etc.
c.
Preferences for reinforcement, recreating, vocational/academic
situation
d.
One functional objectives from IEP or ISP
e.
Eight sessions of data collection for either one
of the objectives
f.
Results and discussion of data collection for the
targeted objective: Was there an
increase? Decrease? Maintenance?
g.
Future recommendations for the individual
participating in community-based vocational instruction.
h.
Discussion/reflection on what you learned from writing
this case study.
4.
Curriculum Reviews: Each
student will be responsible for 5 curriculum review. This is due on the seventh night of class. These reviews will be handwritten on 5’x8’
note cards. You may check out curricula
from my office. Please NOTE: the curricula that you check out will be due
the next week for other students to use.
You should include the following information in your review:
1.Title, author, and date of
publication.
2.Who it was written for—such as the
population of learners, age,
parents, teachers, researchers, etc.
3.Strengths.
4.Weaknesses.
5.Your opinion of it.
6.Would it be useful in your classroom
setting? Why? Or Why not?
The format on your card should be
like this:
1.
Title.
Author. Date of publication.
2.
Written for:
3.
Strengths of Curriculum
4.
Weaknesses of Curriculum
5.
Opinion of curriculum
6.
Usefulness for your setting
Other
assignments or activities may be required as deemed necessary to assure the
mastery of the course objectives as stated.
3. Evaluation Criteria:
25 points Mid-term A=
90 or above points
25 points Final B=
80 – 89 points
25 points Case Study C = 70 – 79 points
25 points Curriculum D
= 60 – 69 points
4. Field Experiences (Initial and
Advanced Certification Tasks):
You will be required to do a
case study using a student or adult with severe/profound
Intellectual
disabilities. The purpose of the case
study is to familiarize you with the
IEP/ISP, functional
objectives, data collection and analysis, and future planning. You will need to
discuss with the instructor
the placement of the student/individual you will be including in your case
study. If you need help finding a subject, please
let the instructor know. For more
information on
the case study, read the
description under CASE STUDY.
XI. RESOURCES:
1.
Bibliography
Best, S., Heller, K., & Bigge, J. (2005). Teaching
individuals with physical or multiple disabilities, (5th ed.). Upper
Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall.
Fraser,
B., Hensinger, R., & Phelps, J.
(1990). Physical management of multiple handicaps: A
professional’s
guide, (2nd ed.) Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
Hilton, A. and Ringlaben, (editors). (1998.) Best and
promising practices in developmental
disabilities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Heller,
K., Alberto, P., Forney, P., & Schwartzman, M. (1996). Understanding physical, sensory, and health
impairments. Pacific Grove, CA:
Brookes/Cole Publishing.
Kennedy, C. & Horn, E. (2004). Including students with severe disabilities. Boston, MA:
Pearson, Allyn and Bacon.
Kurtz, L., Dowrick, P.,
Levy, S., & Batshaw, M. (1996). Handbook of developmental
disabilities:
Resources for interdisciplinary care. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
McDonnell, J., Hardman, M. & McDonnell, A. (2003). An
introduction to persons with
moderate and
severe disabilities: Educational and social issues. (2nd. ed) Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
Pierangelo,
R. & Giuliani, G. (2004). Transition
services in special education: A practical
approach. Boston, MA: Pearson
Publishers.
Rusch,
F. & Chadsey, J. (1998). Beyond
high school: Transition from school to
work.
Belmont,
CA: Wadsworth, Publishing Company.
Ryndak, D. & Alper, S. (2003) Curriculum and instruction for
students with significant
disabilities in inclusive settings. (2nd
ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Sitlington,
P., Clark, G., & Kolstoe, O.
(2000). Transition education and services for
adolescents
with disabilities, (3rd ed.)
Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Snell, M.
(1993). Instruction of students with severe disabilities, (4th ed.) Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Merrill
Publishers.
Sternberg, L. (1994)