The goal of the teacher education program at Piedmont College is to promote the development of scholarly, reflective, and proactive practitioners. The most significant experience prospective teachers have is the semester-long student teaching with constructive performance critiques by host teachers and college supervisors. This evaluation represents cumulative assessments of this student teacher’s work over the semester-long student teaching experience. The performance criteria are adapted from the Georgia Extended Framework for Teaching which has been adopted by the Georgia Professional Standards Commission and State Board of Education as an integrated set of performance standards for the preparation, induction, assessment, development, and support for teachers along a continuum of career growth. Indicators derived from the literature on best practice for teaching and learning are assessed.
Ratings for each indicator (1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc.) by the evaluator are to be determined based on the quality of the evidence demonstrated by the student teacher throughout her/his student teaching experience, not on just one or two observations. Evidence should be factual. It may include assessments of student teacher and student interactions; artifacts prepared by the student teacher, students, or others; assessments of teaching and classroom management; observations of professional interactions with colleagues and administrators; etc. The evidence is not clouded with personal opinion or biases. It is selected using professional judgment. The ratings should not be based on expectations for future performance but on actual evidence of current performance. The following guidelines should be used for the ratings:
| Indicator Minimally Demonstrated:............ |
The least admissible |
| Indicator Adequately Demonstrated:......... |
Sufficient, satisfactory performance |
| Indicator Effectively Demonstrated:........... |
Produces a desired result; productive performance |
| Indicator Exceptionally Demonstrated:..... |
Beyond the customary; superior performance |
|
Undergraduate student teachers are evaluated at the basic and advanced levels of the Georgia Extended Framework for Teaching according to their performance. The evaluator will determine the level (Basic or Advanced) and rating for each indicator. We expect most undergraduate student teachers to perform at the BASIC LEVEL during their student teaching experience. Within that level a candidate should be rated using the following scale
| Indicator Minimally Demonstrated:............ |
1 |
| Indicator Adequately Demonstrated:......... |
2 |
| Indicator Effectively Demonstrated:........... |
3 |
| Indicator Exceptionally Demonstrated:..... |
4 |
|
Some student teachers may perform at the ADVANCED LEVEL on some indicators. These individuals will most likely have had additional experiences, often prior to student teaching, such as being a paraprofessional, working in after school programs, tutoring, volunteer work, etc. which have added depth and breadth to their study in the field. When a candidate performs at the Advanced Level she or he should be rated using the following scale:
| Indicator Minimally Demonstrated:............ |
5 |
| Indicator Adequately Demonstrated:......... |
6 |
| Indicator Effectively Demonstrated:........... |
7 |
| Indicator Exceptionally Demonstrated:..... |
8 |
|
| Keep in mind that “no level is negative, ‘bad practice,’ or deficit; rather, each level illustrates variations in [student] teachers’ practice” (www.teacherbridge.org). The levels are not intended to describe a fixed development sequence over time. Basic reflects initial practice. Advanced reflects solid teaching. |
A candidate could demonstrate minimal work on one indicator, adequate on another, effective on another, and exceptional on another. The following is a sample of how an undergraduate student teacher could be evaluated for
DOMAIN I: CONTENT AND CURRICULUM
| Indicator: |
Score: |
Corresponding Rating: |
| 1.1 Knowledge Base |
2 |
Basic, Adequately Demonstrated |
| 1.2 Knowledge of Content Learning |
2 |
Basic, Adequately Demonstrated |
| 1.3 Content Currency |
3 |
Basic, Effectively Demonstrated |
| 1.4 Content Relevancy |
6 |
Advanced, Adequately Demonstrated |
| 1.5 Use of Resources |
4 |
Basic, Exceptionally Demonstrated |
| 1.6 Curriculum Requirements |
2 |
Basic, Adequately Demonstrated |
|
| Please reference the full descriptors with accompanying Sample Evidence listings on the full Georgia Extended Framework document located on the Piedmont School of Education website under "Assessments & Surveys". Also available at www.gapsc.com. |
|
|