Student Teacher Performance Assessment (STPA) Graduate Self-Assessment
Based on the Georgia Extended Framework for Teaching
The goal of the teacher education program at Piedmont College is to promote the development of scholarly, reflective, and proactive practitioners. The most significant experience prospective teachers have is the semester-long student teaching with constructive performance critiques by host teachers and college supervisors.
This evaluation represents cumulative assessments of this student teacher’s work over the semester-long student teaching experience. The performance criteria are adapted from the Georgia Extended Framework for Teaching which has been adopted by the Georgia Professional Standards Commission and State Board of Education as an integrated set of performance standards for the preparation, induction, assessment, development, and support for teachers along a continuum of career growth. Indicators derived from the literature on best practice for teaching and learning are assessed.
Ratings for each indicator (1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc.) by the evaluator are to be determined based on the quality of the evidence demonstrated by the student teacher throughout her/his student teaching experience, not on just one or two observations. Evidence should be factual. It may include assessments of student teacher and student interactions; artifacts prepared by the student teacher, students, or others; assessments of teaching and classroom management; observations of professional interactions with colleagues and administrators; etc. The evidence is not clouded with personal opinion or biases. It is selected using professional judgment. The ratings should not be based on expectations for future performance but on actual evidence of current performance. The following guidelines should be used for the ratings:
Indicator Minimally Demonstrated:............
The least admissible
Indicator Adequately Demonstrated:.........
Sufficient, satisfactory performance
Indicator Effectively Demonstrated:...........
Produces a desired result; productive performance
Indicator Exceptionally Demonstrated:.....
Beyond the customary; superior performance
Graduate MAT student teachers are evaluated at the basic, advanced, and accomplished levels of the Georgia Extended Framework for Teaching according to their performance. The evaluator will determine the level (Basic, Advanced, or Accomplished) and rating for each indicator. We expect most MAT student teachers to perform at the BASIC LEVEL on most indicators, at the ADVANCED LEVEL on some, and possibly at the ACCOMPLISHED LEVEL on a few others during their student teaching experience. The candidate should be rated on his or her performance using the following scale:
Basic:
Advanced:
Accomplished:
Indicator Minimally Demonstrated:
1
Indicator Minimally Demonstrated:
5
Indicator Minimally Demonstrated:
9
Indicator Adequately Demonstrated:
2
Indicator Adequately Demonstrated:
6
Indicator Adequately Demonstrated:
10
Indicator Effectively Demonstrated:
3
Indicator Effectively Demonstrated:
7
Indicator Effectively Demonstrated:
11
Indicator Exceptionally Demonstrated:
4
Indicator Exceptionally Demonstrated:
8
Indicator Exceptionally Demonstrated:
12
Keep in mind that “no level is negative, ‘bad practice,’ or deficit; rather, each level illustrates variations in [student] teachers’ practice” (www.teacherbridge.org). The levels are not intended to describe a fixed development sequence over time. Basic reflects initial practice, beginning as a teacher. Advanced reflects solid teaching. Student teachers who perform at the advanced level will most likely have had additional experiences, often prior to student teaching, such as being a paraprofessional, working in after school programs, tutoring, volunteer work, etc. which have added depth and breadth to their study in the field. Accomplished reflects solid teaching that extends toward that of a Nationally Board Certified teacher, one who demonstrates superior performance in the classroom.
A candidate could demonstrate minimal work on one indicator, adequate on another, effective on another, and exceptional on another. The following is a sample of how a graduate student teacher could be evaluated for DOMAIN I: CONTENT AND CURRICULUM
Indicator:
Score:
Corresponding Rating:
1.1 Knowledge Base
2
Basic, Adequately Demonstrated
1.2 Knowledge of Content Learning
2
Basic, Adequately Demonstrated
1.3 Content Currency
3
Basic, Effectively Demonstrated
1.4 Content Relevancy
6
Advanced, Adequately Demonstrated
1.5 Use of Resources
4
Basic, Exceptionally Demonstrated
1.6 Curriculum Requirements
9
Accomplished, Demonstrated
Please reference the full descriptors with accompanying Sample Evidence listings on the full Georgia Extended Framework document located on the Piedmont School of Education website under "Assessments & Surveys". Also available at www.gapsc.com.